Key facts
- About 232 claims whose KYC had been rejected for a curable defect were left out of the original KYC objection and included in the 2026 one (Trust objection, D.I. 35232, 1 April 2026).
- For those claims, the final KYC submission deadline was 30 June 2026, 4:00 p.m. ET; claims still incomplete faced expungement (Order, D.I. 35557, 11 May 2026).
- Over 47,600 claims were expunged for not completing KYC by the June 2025 deadline, the Trust told the court on 16 July 2026 (Trust objection, D.I. 36001).
- Nearly 440,000 customer claims in total were permanently expunged under the 2025 KYC order (Trust objection, D.I. 35232, 1 April 2026).
- In the Bahamas process, creditors who do not satisfy a KYC request within 90 days of the first request are deemed to forfeit their distribution (PwC liquidators' live updates, 23 May 2025).
Start with the official Failed status
In the U.S. Chapter 11 process, FTX uses Failed for unsuccessful document verification or KYC, AML or sanctions screening. It is not automatically a court decision expunging the claim. The official explanation also describes the possibility of a claim objection; the applicable notice matters.
โIt means that we were not able to verify the documentation you provided to us or otherwise you have not passed our KYC / AML / Sanction screening process.โ
โ KYC Statuses Explained, June 2, 2025
A Failed status can mean unverifiable documents or a failed AML or sanctions screen, so the stated reason decides what you can do next.
Identify which process produced the result. An FTX portal status, a Bahamas identity-verification message and a distribution provider's onboarding refusal come from different processes. Check the official U.S. status definitions or the Bahamas portal guidance for the process handling your claim.
Read the reason and the requested action
Keep a copy of the status and the full notice. Look for the claim reference, the reason given, any document request, a response date and the specified reply channel. If the message does not say whether a correction can be submitted, ask that question before sending another set of documents.
Where a correctable document problem is identified, respond to that problem. Explain an inconsistent name or an outdated address and provide the evidence requested through the authorised upload route. Do not assume that a clearer scan can resolve every screening outcome.
Where the reason is unclear, a useful question is: โDoes this notice allow me to submit further information, and if so, what information is needed and by when?โ There is no basis for treating every refusal as a standard appeal with a universal deadline.
Check whether the claim itself has been affected
A claim objection, a court order and a KYC screen need to be read separately. If a notice refers to disallowance or expungement, obtain the referenced filing and check whether your claim is covered. Do not describe it as a routine document resubmission without checking the claim record.
โWhere the Original Holder of a Customer Entitlement Claim has not commenced the KYC submission process, or has failed to submit all requested KYC information, the Debtors are missing a critical element of such Customer Entitlement Claim.โ
โ Debtors' One Hundred Thirtieth (Non-Substantive) Omnibus Objection to Unverified Customer Entitlement Claims, D.I. 28225, November 22, 2024
Missing KYC is treated as a defect in the claim itself, which is why it can lead to a court objection and expungement.
Where an objection or order is involved, advice on that specific filing may be needed to understand any available response.
If the refusal came from a payment provider
Check the selected provider's own decision and the information held on that account. FTX's distribution-provider guidance treats provider eligibility and onboarding separately. A provider refusal should not be rewritten as an FTX claim rejection.
Can a claim with rejected KYC still be considered for sale?
A buyer needs to understand the failed check, the claim's legal status and the transfer requirements before deciding whether a transaction is possible. An unresolved screening issue or a claim order can affect that assessment. Changing the proposed recipient is not evidence that the issue has disappeared.
You can ask Qredax to assess your claim using the actual status and notices. Qredax also reviews expunged claims case by case, at a discount that reflects the risk that the claim is never reinstated. An assessment or indicative offer is not confirmation that a transfer can close. The KYC requirements before selling explain the questions to resolve, including the difference between U.S. and Bahamas claims.
Frequently asked questions
Can I always appeal an FTX KYC rejection?
Do not assume a standard appeal is available. Check the actual notice for a response route, deadline and invitation to supply evidence. Ask support to clarify an incomplete notice.
Will a sale remove the reason for a failed check?
No. A sale does not change the claim's status or the reason behind it. Disclose the issue and the claim record so the buyer can assess the applicable verification and transfer requirements โ and, for a Failed claim, whether the status could still be corrected.
Does Failed automatically mean that my claim was expunged?
No. The portal result and the legal status of the claim need to be checked separately. Read any objection or order referenced in your notice before deciding how to respond.
Is a payment-provider refusal an FTX KYC rejection?
Not necessarily. Identify who issued the refusal and which account or stage it concerns. Provider onboarding and FTX claim verification are separate processes.
Sources
- FTX: KYC statuses
- FTX: distribution service providers
- FTX: guidelines on sales of claims
- PwC: claims portal guide, July 2025
- In re FTX Trading Ltd., Case No. 22-11068 (KBO) (Bankr. D. Del.), case page of the claims and noticing agent, Kroll Restructuring Administration
- Order Sustaining Debtors' One Hundred Thirtieth (Non-Substantive) Omnibus Objection to Unverified Customer Entitlement Claims, In re FTX Trading Ltd., No. 22-11068 (JTD) (Bankr. D. Del. Feb. 3, 2025), D.I. 29464
- FTX Recovery Trust's Two Hundredth (Non-Substantive) Omnibus Objection to Unverified Customer Entitlement Claims, In re FTX Trading Ltd., No. 22-11068 (KBO) (Bankr. D. Del. Apr. 1, 2026), D.I. 35232
- Order Sustaining FTX Recovery Trust's Two Hundredth (Non-Substantive) Omnibus Objection to Unverified Customer Entitlement Claims, In re FTX Trading Ltd., No. 22-11068 (KBO) (Bankr. D. Del. May 11, 2026), D.I. 35557
- Objection of the FTX Recovery Trust to Motion for Reconsideration Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 60(b)(2), In re FTX Trading Ltd., No. 22-11068 (KBO) (Bankr. D. Del. July 16, 2026), D.I. 36001
- Debtors' One Hundred Thirtieth (Non-Substantive) Omnibus Objection to Unverified Customer Entitlement Claims, In re FTX Trading Ltd., No. 22-11068 (JTD) (Bankr. D. Del. Nov. 22, 2024), D.I. 28225
- Joint Official Liquidators of FTX Digital Markets Ltd. (PwC), "FTX Digital Markets Ltd. (in Provisional Liquidation): Live updates on the status of the claim process", update of May 23, 2025 (pwc.com/bs)



